Trust is a big part of company culture, especially for the ones that offer a high degree of freedom to employees. Monitoring employees can put a question mark on that trust-based company culture.
FREMONT, CA: In this digital era, the question of whether to monitor employees do not have a clear and definite answer. While some employers agree that monitoring is necessary to maintain productivity, employees may feel a sense of distrust and a violation of privacy when monitoring techniques are implemented.
Let us look at the not-so-bright-side of employee monitoring at the workplace:
Trust is a big part of company culture, especially for the ones that offer a high degree of freedom to employees. Monitoring employees can put a question mark on that trust-based company culture. In some cases, this might even increase turnover or discourage top talent from working for a company. Therefore, employee monitoring should be employed in a manner that employee trust stays unharmed.
Potential Alerts Instead of Monitoring
Companies can improve productivity and reduce personal use of electronics in many other ways rather than constantly policing employees’ work. Employers can set up a system to send alerts if suspicious activity is detected so that employees can be investigated in case of any mishaps.
Communication May Help
Constant monitoring can make employees feel anxious and unsettling. They may also think they are being targeted. Hence, it may be helpful to communicate with employees on clear terms addressing the issues that have been identified and how monitoring can stop these problems from occurring. Employers need to be clear about what will be monitored. This way, employees will not feel so vulnerable and distrusted.
See Also: Top HR Tech Solution Companies